Tuesday, July 5, 2022
HomeCameraCrimson is suing Nikon for allegedly infringing on its video compression know-how...

Crimson is suing Nikon for allegedly infringing on its video compression know-how with the Z9’s N-RAW video seize: Digital Images Assessment

A brand new lawsuit, filed by representatives for cinema digital camera producer RED, accuses Nikon of illegally utilizing its patented information compression know-how in its Nikon Z9 full-frame mirrorless digital camera.

In keeping with the lawsuit, filed within the U.S. District Courtroom for the Central District of California, the plaintiff, Crimson.com, LLC (RED), is accusing the defendant, Nikon Company (Nikon), of patent infringement. Particularly, RED is accusing Nikon of knowingly utilizing know-how described in RED’s patents pertaining to ‘extremely compress[ed] video information in a visually lossless method’ in its Nikon’s Z collection mirrorless cameras, ‘such because the “Nikon Z9 with Firmware 2.0.”’

As we reported again in December 2021, Nikon is licensing intoPIX’s TicoRAW know-how for the 8K/60p N-Uncooked video in its Z9 mirrorless digital camera. What’s attention-grabbing is that intoPIX describes its patented TicoRAW know-how as ‘mathematically lossless and visually lossless all the way down to 1 bit per pixel,’ which is extremely just like how RED describes its know-how.

A screenshot from intoPIX’s web site exhibiting the advantages of its patented TicoRAW know-how.

RED additional alleges Nikon knew about these patented applied sciences and its ‘prior lawsuits involving a number of of the asserted patents.’ Particularly, RED mentions its complaints in opposition to Kinefinity, Nokia and Sony, with Sony going as far as to countersue RED for infringing upon its patents.

In keeping with RED’s grievance, Nikon’s use of its patented compression know-how is ‘more likely to trigger irreparable hurt to RED, which can’t be adequately compensated by cash damages,’ by ‘misplaced gross sales and earnings, lowered enterprise, and harm to its basic status and trade standing.’ Regardless of alleging it ‘can’t be adequately compensated by cash damages, RED says it’s ‘entitled to a rise of damages as much as thrice the quantity discovered or assessed not less than resulting from Nikon’s willful and deliberate infringement [and] entitled to an award of its attorneys’ charges as a result of Nikon’s infringement presents an distinctive case.’

RED can be looking for ‘a preliminary and everlasting injunction enjoining Nikon from infringing the claims,’ that means it needs Nikon to cease selling and promoting the merchandise allegedly infringing upon RED’s know-how. What isn’t clear is why RED is suing Nikon as a substitute of intoPIX, contemplating Nikon’s licensing of intoPIX’s TicoRAW know-how was pretty nicely coated in trade. Nevertheless, RED does particularly point out that Nikon sells merchandise in the identical channels because it does within the grievance and notes gross sales Nikon’s allegedly infringing merchandise will harm RED’s backside line.

That is purely hypothesis, nevertheless it’s attainable RED does not really feel as if they’ve a case in opposition to intoPIX, since they’re in several markets: digital camera {hardware} vs codec licensing, respectively. It is also attainable RED is hoping this grievance will lead to a settlement with Nikon, who can probably afford to come back to a extra substantial monetary settlement in comparison with intoPIX.

Beneath is the total grievance:

We have now contacted each Nikon and RED for feedback on this matter. As of publishing this text, solely Nikon responded, however mentioned it was ‘unable to touch upon the matter.’



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments